Re: Work-needing packages report for Sep 6, 2002
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:20:23 +0200 (CEST)
tomas p <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Interesting. This is exactly the argument for removing unmaintained
> > packages: just by existing they cause more work for certain people.
> I assume naively that it's mostly software (bts, mirroring, etc. ) that
> takes care of those packages. In what way do they cause work for people
> that are not directly interested in those packages?
I'm interested in whole of Debian rebuilding from source.
These packages are a burden to me.