Is this still valid?

[Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>]

Hi

I just wonder if this lintian error is still applicable?

W: harden-tools: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
N:
N:   The technical committee chose the symlink transition method to move
N:   from FSSTND to FHS. This transition involves setting the link in the
N:   postinst script and removing it in the prerm script. Here is an
N:   example (/bin/sh):
N:    if [ \( "$1" = "upgrade" -o "$1" = "remove" \) -a -L /usr/doc/pkg ]; then
N:      rm -f /usr/doc/pkg
N:    fi
N:   The test for this is not perfect. If you are setting the link, please
N:   send the line of code to us so we can improve the test.
N:
W: harden-tools: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
N:
N:   The technical committee chose the symlink transition method to move
N:   from FSSTND to FHS. This transition involves setting the link in the
N:   postinst script and removing it in the prerm script. Here is an
N:   example (/bin/sh):
N:    if [ "$1" = "configure" ]; then
N:     if [ -d /usr/doc -a ! -e /usr/doc/pkg -a -d /usr/share/doc/pkg ]; then
N:      ln -sf ../share/doc/pkg /usr/doc/pkg
N:     fi
N:    fi
N:   The test for this is not perfect. If you are setting the link, please
N:   send the line of code to us so we can improve the test.


Or should I simply ignore it.

I think that it is due to the /usr/doc /usr/share/doc thing but I'm
not sure.

Regards,

// Ola

-- 
 --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/  opal@debian.org                     Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11   \
|  opal@lysator.liu.se                 584 36 LINKÖPING         |
|  +46 (0)13-17 69 83                  +46 (0)70-332 1551       |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org             UIN/icq: 4912500         |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------