Re: Accepted sdl-image1.2 1.2.2-1 (i386 source)
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Accepted sdl-image1.2 1.2.2-1 (i386 source)
- From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 02:23:54 +0900
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20020808022354.0f678987.dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
- In-reply-to: <20020729210215.GO1858@netexpress.net>
- References: <20020724150316.GA25286@informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> <20020724152829.A25780@debian.org> <20020724213013.GV19651@netexpress.net> <20020728024221.06f8a763.dancer@netfort.gr.jp> <20020727182705.GD16028@netexpress.net> <20020728035351.738ca663.dancer@netfort.gr.jp> <20020727192941.GE16028@netexpress.net> <20020728092352.45337782.dancer@netfort.gr.jp> <20020728162601.GH22420@dodds.net> <20020730052043.666fee89.dancer@netfort.gr.jp> <20020729210215.GO1858@netexpress.net>
Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net> immo vero scripsit:
I've had a backlog of mail, so I might be too late to respond to this mail:
> But creating 'libgtk2.0png3' also makes us incompatible with other
> distros; thus we need to recompile libgtk2.0 against libpng3, WITHOUT
> changing the soname.
We are not changing the soname, only the package name.
Changing the package name and conflicting with the old package
will implement something essentially the same as a libgtk2.0-0 package
that conflicts with anything that was compiled with libpng2.
You still haven't read libpkg-guide, yet. Have you?
regards,
junichi
--
dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
Reply to: