Hello Lazarus, On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 10:27:18PM +0000, Lazarus Long wrote: > Package: lilo > Version: 1:22.3.2-1 > > lilo (1:22.3.2-1) unstable; urgency=HIGH > > * New upstream version. > Closes: #136757 > > -- Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> Sat, 3 Aug 2002 23:34:00 +0200 > > "WTF? If someone files a wishlist bug about a new upstream version, > WHY would this qualify as urgency high? (And ALL-CAPS for some reason > as well?) Is the maintainer on crack?" Are you on crack flaming a maintainer without checking the facts? Maybe it would have been more nice to include a summary of the problem which is fixed. But at least he did a new release and it seems to work fine. So what is your problem? Please stop inventing problems and frustrating committed Debian developers. > Why can't some people write a reasonable changelog entry? What happened Why can't people spend their time on more important stuff like fixing their mail setup? Not sure if that still applies but ever when I wanted to get more info on bugs you submitted the address you used for sending the report bounced. Annoyed Torsten
Attachment:
pgpyxfTEh0XHR.pgp
Description: PGP signature