Re: ITO: LILO
On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 05:21:02AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 07:30:42PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Why is it asking so much that maintainers should say *something* about
> > the bug in the changelog entry where it's being closed?
> Because he might have some other work to do? Especially if a new upstream
> releases fixes a bug, it is imho enough to claim so. This clearly indicates
> a more interested reader to read upstream changelog.
ehm, no. This Changelog-style indicates *at least for me* that somebody
was bitching about "new upstream version available" and he now closed
Michael, getting back to work
<doogie> I have a t-shirt: Go away or I will replace you with a
very small shell script.