Re: package name too generic?
On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 10:09:26PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > >
> > > how about kuml?
> > >
> > that's another project. furthermore uml.sourceforge.net links against qt
> > and kde libs, but is not a fully integrated kde app, nor is it an
> > official member of kde.
> What has that got to do with anything? Did the KDE project patent the
> use of words beginning with 'k' as descriptive names?
well, kde doesn't have a patent on words starting with a 'k', but being
part of kde would be a *reason* to prefix a package name with a 'k' to
indicate so. that's why i said it's not part of kde, so i see no reason
to do so.
to clarify the whole subject: the package is named "uml" upstream, what
i think is too generic. "kuml" is another project, and has nothing to do
i just wanted to ask whether anybody has a suggestion for a name, and
whether "uml-modeller" (american now ;-) is still too generic. most
people don't care, one thought it is. since i can't think of anything
better i will go with "uml-modeller" for now.