Re: package name too generic?
On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 11:16:08AM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2002 13:51:36 +0200
> Robert Lemmen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > i have a program that i want to package, a uml modeller for kde
> > (uml.sourceforge.net). but i think the name "uml" they use for their
> > package and binary is too generic, i would use "uml-modeller" instead.
> > is that ok?? any suggestions?
> Seems good to me. Except I think the correct spelling might be
> "modeler". Dunno for sure though, check a local dictionary ;)
s/correct/US English/. :) British English uses "modeller".
Colin Watson [email@example.com]