[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: IPv6 Virtual Package (Was Re: ping and inetd)

On Mon, 5 Aug 2002, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:

# No I don´t agree on the process of splitting pkgs in this way.
# It will bloat the archive with pkgs made of few kbytes.
# Instead we should go exactly the other way around and merging
# as much as we can so that you will not have even to remember
# to install a specific pkg to support ipv6.

i agree fabio, what i mean with spliting ping6 and traceroute6 is to split
between ipv6 and ipv4, not based on the application name, thats why there
must be an IPv6 virtual pkg

Cheers, Indra Kusuma
  ,''`. How (Debian GNU/)Linux Are You ? . http://{Indra,Debian}.Kusuma.OR.ID
 : :' : How IPv6 Are You ? ......................... http://ipv6.debian.or.id
 `. `'  1024D/4D829E49 ... 187D 8C98 FB76 E1A8 5558  853A 4795 4FC1 4D82 9E49

Reply to: