Re: Shared library defines a RPATH
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 02:12:01PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
> The problem is: rpath looks like the standard, simple answer to the problem,
> while it actually has a lot of side-effects that are not really desirable
> (and not obvious, either).
Could you elaborate on the side effects? Every time rpath comes up
the discussion is not very productive. It would be nice to have a
place where the pros and cons (and future solutions) are listed so the
discussion can start from some place rational.
--
James (Jay) Treacy
treacy@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: