Re: Shared library defines a RPATH

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Shared library defines a RPATH
From: Will Newton <will@misconception.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 15:36:03 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] E17Yp6G-0003ag-00.2002-07-28-15-32-49@cmailm2.svr.pol.co.uk>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020728032433.7f6ae47f.dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
References: <[🔎] 20020726091121.GB12518@eric.ath.cx> <[🔎] E17YVwK-0001DX-00.2002-07-27-19-05-16@cmailg7.svr.pol.co.uk> <[🔎] 20020728032433.7f6ae47f.dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

On Saturday 27 Jul 2002 7:24 pm, Junichi Uekawa wrote:

> I have no idea why they should be a shared library at all
> in the first place.

That does not help me very much.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Shared library defines a RPATH
  - From: Eric Van Buggenhaut <Eric.VanBuggenhaut@AdValvas.be>
- Re: Shared library defines a RPATH
  - From: Will Newton <will@misconception.org.uk>
- Re: Shared library defines a RPATH
  - From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

Prev by Date: Re: Shared library defines a RPATH
Next by Date: Re: Upgrading to woody -> md5sum gave malformatted output
Previous by thread: Re: Shared library defines a RPATH
Next by thread: Bug#154351: ITP: kernel-patch-nfs-ngroups -- client-side bypass of ngroups limitation (16) in NFS/RPC protocol
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread