Re: Why not the Simpsons? (was: Re: Woody++)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why not the Simpsons? (was: Re: Woody++)
From: Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:35:40 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020722183540.GG26518@flounder.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020722183437.GB548@demiurgo.org>
References: <[🔎] 20020721181814.GA9228@linuxbr.com.br> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0207212029500.21067-100000@pinkstuff.transformers.org.uk> <[🔎] 20020722111822.GD13175@dat.etsit.upm.es> <[🔎] 20020722183437.GB548@demiurgo.org>

On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 07:34:37PM +0100, Esteban Manchado Vel?zquez wrote:
>    Hmmm.... What about The Simpsons?

LAME.

--Adam
-- 
Adam McKenna  <adam@debian.org>  <adam@flounder.net>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Woody++
  - From: Leonardo Boiko <leoboiko@linuxbr.com.br>
- Re: Woody++
  - From: Thomas Thurman <thomas@thurman.org.uk>
- Re: Woody++
  - From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>
- Why not the Simpsons? (was: Re: Woody++)
  - From: Esteban Manchado Velázquez <zoso@demiurgo.org>

Prev by Date: Why not the Simpsons? (was: Re: Woody++)
Next by Date: Re: Accepted sdl-image1.2 1.2.2-1 (i386 source)
Previous by thread: Why not the Simpsons? (was: Re: Woody++)
Next by thread: Re: Why not the Simpsons? (was: Re: Woody++)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread