RE: gnupg-doc of standard priority?

To: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <shalehperry@attbi.com>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: gnupg-doc of standard priority?
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 19:59:52 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.44.0207131959340.13254-314159@home.unex.es>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] XFMail.20020713104444.shalehperry@attbi.com>

On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> There is no reason for it to be standard, file the bug (-:

Done. Thanks.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- RE: gnupg-doc of standard priority?
  - From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <shalehperry@attbi.com>

Prev by Date: RE: gnupg-doc of standard priority?
Next by Date: sendmail: Why does submit.mc lack FEATURE(`use_ct_file')dnl?
Previous by thread: RE: gnupg-doc of standard priority?
Next by thread: Re: gnupg-doc of standard priority?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread