* Scott James Remnant (scott@netsplit.com) wrote: > > It's pretty simple really. You're going to find out at the same time > > either way, it's just that in the first case there will be a package > > ready when you find out and in the second case there won't be and you'll > > have to wait for one. > > > > So, which would you prefer, for there to be a package ready when you > > find out, or for there to not be one? > > > >From a user point of view, the latter. I'd rather pull a service down > because of an exploit, and wait for a package than to not know about an > exploit for one of my systems. No, you don't understand. The user is going to find out *at the same time*. At the time the user finds out there can either be a package ready, or not. I don't believe any user would pick not. Stephen
Attachment:
pgpA0eS4jLsqW.pgp
Description: PGP signature