Re: looking for a TeX guy to (help to) package PassiveTeX
* Atsuhito Kohda
| From: Tollef Fog Heen <email@example.com>
| Subject: Re: looking for a TeX guy to (help to) package PassiveTeX
| Date: 19 Jun 2002 08:43:11 +0200
| > Which package should get the serious bug for not preserving user
| > changes in /etc/texmf/texmf.conf?
| None. No packages own /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf anymore
| in woody but it will be generated with update-texmf.
That does not matter.
| That is, it is not a conffile but a configuration file.
User changes still need to be preserved. If you were modifying it and
it was a conffile that is also wrong.
| A user should modify files in /etc/texmf/texmf.d/ and
| run "update-texmf" if it is really necessary for him/her
| to do so.
You still need to preserve user changes. Is this so extremely hard to
understand? If it's assumed not to be user-editable, it should not be
Tollef Fog Heen ,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com