Re: Bug#147303: ITP: winex -- A DESCRIPTION
>>"Ove" == Ove Kaaven <email@example.com> writes:
Ove> But in the role of a transgaming affiliate, I'd prefer that you
Ove> don't if you want them to have an income; they're not "lying",
I appreciate you disclose the potential source of bias up
front. However, if the license state ``you can freely distribyute'',
buyt they say prvately you should not, or we shall take the whole
ball of wax and walk away, are they truly not lying?
Ove> the license do allow you to make packages, but that permission
Ove> is meant to allow "fair use" (you can make packages for
Ove> yourself, or give packages to your friends to show them what
Ove> they can do), it's not intended for mass distribution of
Ove> unsupported binaries. If mass distribution happens anyway, then
Ove> the license would be changed to stop it, and then that fair use
Ove> would no longer be legal either, is that what you want?
a) a license change can not do away with fair use, it takes an
act of congress, and perhaps a constitutional amendment to that
here in the US.
b) bullshit. If that is what they wanted, they could have said
so in the license.
Ove> But if you really want to commit such controversy
Commit a contoversy? What controversy? One is merely folowing
the license on the software.
Luck, that's when preparation and opportunity meet. P.E. Trudeau
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org