Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy
From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 21:38:49 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020528013849.GA20128@dman.com>
Mail-followup-to: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020527093700.GF8300@linuxasylum.net>
References: <[🔎] 20020527084253.GD8300@linuxasylum.net> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0205270345250.9857-100000@yakko.doogie.org> <[🔎] 20020527093700.GF8300@linuxasylum.net>

> /usr/bin/which: type: illegal option: -q
> type: usage: type [-apt] name [name ...]

Something should be done about that usage line.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy
  - From: Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis <luca@linuxasylum.net>
- Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy
  - From: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>
- Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy
  - From: Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis <luca@linuxasylum.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#147077: What is with the kernel maintainer? (How not to close Bug#147077)
Next by Date: Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy
Previous by thread: which should use `--' [ Was: Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy]
Next by thread: Re: command -v in postinsts violating policy
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread