Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd

[Lars Weber <me@lars.in-berlin.de>]

tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) wrote:
[...]
> There are more, but this is a brief list of some of the ones that have
> come up with so far.

All this talk about reasons for using `/hurd' got me wondering: Do there
exist potential problems when a translator that translates a certain
directory is itself located somewhere inside that directory?

This might not be the case, but if it is I think this would be reason
enough to use a separate directory.

Regards,
Lars


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org