[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Editor Priorities

Previously Matthew Palmer wrote:
> I'll ask the opposite question - why give priority to them, just because
> they happen to support multi-languages?  I thing there are several more
> important aspects to an editor than that.

I would love to see your reaction if you suddenly get a default editor
that is only capable of editing Japanese. I'm sure you will suddenly
change your opinion.

> So on the one hand, there are easy ways to do so, but it takes years to do
> it?  That seems like a *damn* good reason to do it, from my point of view as
> a volunteer software developer.  You did it because it matters to you.  I
> don't do it because it takes years to do.  Somehow I'm a racist for not
> volunteering my time for years of work?

WTF has race got to do with it? I'm severly disappointed someone would
even suggest that.


 /wichert@wiggy.net         This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org            http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: