Re: init.d scripts and LSB
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: init.d scripts and LSB
- From: Michael Schultheiss <schultmc@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 17:25:40 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20020507222540.GB8905@cartman.hq.amellus.com>
- In-reply-to: <87znzbfw5p.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>
- References: <20020506031609.GA18981@eye-net.com.au> <ab875j$5um$1@ncc1701.cistron.net> <20020507165152.GB2580@grantbow.com> <20020507221711.A3678@cistron.nl> <87znzbfw5p.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> You really think we must abandon .deb package format and
> switch over to rpm's for LSB conformance? You think the LSB has a
> snowballs chance in hell of succeeding if they mandate that (which I
> believe they do not)?
It's my understanding that LSB compliant distributions must have a way to
install LSB (i.e. RPM) packages - alien(1) fits that bill for Debian.
Debian isn't expected to give up .deb.
Attachment:
pgpD0ib06jHeZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: