Re: Link to homepage of Package
- To: Debian Development liste <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Link to homepage of Package
- From: Tommi Virtanen <tv@debian.org>
- Date: 05 May 2002 16:01:34 +0300
- Message-id: <[🔎] 876622yci9.fsf@ki.yok.utu.fi>
- In-reply-to: <878z75kld2.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>
- References: <20020430111849.0fee15b1.dancer@netfort.gr.jp> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204300850220.1425-100000@wr-linux02.rki.ivbb.bund.de> <20020430150339.GC23586@alcor.net> <878z75kld2.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes:
> Matt> A link to the Debian package page does not provide any new
> Matt> information. If there is no appropriate URL, it should simply
> Matt> be omitted.
> It does provide one bit of meta information -- it tells me
> that this is a package for which an upstream url does not exist, as
> opposed to a package which does not yet follow the new convention.
>
> What you are suggesting would make it impossible to
> differentiate between a package foir which no url exsts, and a
> package whose maintainer has just not gotten around to fixing the
> description.
I've always wanted to say
Build-Depends:
to mean that yes, I've looked at the issue and no, there are
no build-deps.
--
tv@{{hq.yok.utu,havoc,gaeshido}.fi,{debian,wanderer}.org,stonesoft.com}
double a,b=4,c;main(){for(;++a<2e6;c-=(b=-b)/a++);printf("%f\n",c);}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: