Re: [2002-04-30] Release Status Update
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Don't hold your breath; they are busy. It is just too late.
I never had any doubt that they are busy.
> Five of my packages are removed or scheduled to be removed, all due to
> archive problems beyond my control. Such is the way of the release.
I just repeat: I do not whine about the fact that packages I maintain
and I depend from seem to not make their way into Woody. They are surely
not very important for Debian as a whole.
I just wonder if it is a good idea to fix a bug which *might* break an
upgrade under some circumstances if it results in the *hard fact* that
it *will* break an upgrade. This situation sucks.
In my opinion this is a RC bug against project. No - I will not do
this make even more work to busy people because if some really
unimportant packages. But I would like to see a general solution
for this problem (and for sure would be happy if the packages in question
would serve as example to test ;-) ).
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org