[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: woody is frozen ? (Re: Accepted gtk+2.0 2.0.2-4 (i386 source all))

On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 08:28:52AM -0500, Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net> was heard to say:
> Isn't anyone else bothered to see so many uploads with urgency=high
> because people are trying to squeeze them under the deadline?  Is
> requiring a period of package testing before they're included in woody
> only a good idea when we're /not/ just about to release?

  I am, and I also uploaded a few urgency=high packages over the last
few weeks (although not the last few days)


/-------------------- Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> -------------------\
|                   "He is so predictable, we could emulate                   |
|                    him with a two-state Turing Machine."                    |
\---------------------- A duck! -- http://www.python.org ---------------------/

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: