Re: 88 Priority violations in woody
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 03:26:58PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 01:30:20AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > * Policy is not a stick to beat people with. It's a guideline, that should be
> > followed closely, but not exactly.
> I think you are misquoting this. Policy is not a stick means that you can
> not add new things to policy that a majority or large number of packages
> violate. But this particular piece of policy is very old, and always
> applied.
Actually, it's been consistently ignored, certainly as far as RC bugs go.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``BAM! Science triumphs again!''
-- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: