[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free =?iso-8859-15?q?software in?= main)

On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 02:57:32PM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 14:39, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > 
> > I'd be happy to hear clarifications from the author and contemporaries,
> > then; to be honest, my memory of Debian history isn't good enough to 
> > even know who to approach.  (The debian-doc package is conspicuously 
> > lacking of the relevant copyright information, btw. :)
> Here's a statement from Bruce Perens:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200111/msg00063.html

Bruce also used a questionable similarity, ignored the possibility of
authors mis-applying the license, and failed to rebut any of the points
made in response to his message (and not only by me).

G. Branden Robinson                |      "I came, I saw, she conquered."
Debian GNU/Linux                   |      The original Latin seems to have
branden@debian.org                 |      been garbled.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |      -- Robert Heinlein

Attachment: pgp69TDAcwOAQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: