[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free =?iso-8859-15?q?software in?= main)

On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:01:15AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 01:42, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:27:40AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > DFSG stand for "Debian Free Software Guidelines". IMHO we ave to create a 
> > > DFDG, "Debian Free Documentation Guidelines".
> > Why?  What freedoms are important for software that aren't for documentation?
> Revisionist history, for one.  

How about correcting a supposedly historical document, for example,
taking a document that describes Windows as the progenitor of the trend
for GUIs, and adding some explanation about Apple and Xerox and suchlike?


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

     ``BAM! Science triumphs again!'' 
                    -- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: