Le lun 08/04/2002 à 19:12, Dale Scheetz a écrit : > So, in fact, both of these licenses are non-free, as they contain > clauses that can be used, and will be considered non-free. > I find it ... foolish to declare a license to be free IFF some clauses of > the license are not exercised. Using this language, any proprietary > license becomes free as long as none of the proprietary sections are > inforced by the author... So, you mean that the license allows that, after being modified, the document can become non-free. Using the same logic, the BSD license is non-free too. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature