On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 11:14:08PM +0200, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: > Il dom, 2002-04-07 alle 21:34, Martin Schulze ha scritto: > > Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > The GNU FDL violates the DFSG ? > > > > I thought that it hasn't been finally resolved if the GNU FDL meets > > the DFSG or not. However, there seemed to be consensus on documents > > released under the GFDL with large sections marked invariant are > > probably not DFSG-compliant, but documents with small, off-topic > > parts are. Check the archive of debian-legal. > > i can be wrong but the new fdl specifies that invariant sections should > be off-topic. The funny thing is that this is made clear in the thread he pointed at. That thread is a really interested read BTW (it makes me subscribe to debian-legal :-). Jeroen Dekkers -- Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: jdekkers@jabber.org Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org IRC: jeroen@openprojects
Attachment:
pgpAfSNMgN6IO.pgp
Description: PGP signature