Re: debmake x dh-make
Daniel Ruoso <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > Because it's not. debhelper is not a drop-in replacement for debmake.
> But the question is... shouldn't it be?
NO! debmake was deeply flawed in its interface and implementation,
and were debhelper to be a drop-in replacement it would always be
fighting those constraints. Bug-for-bug compatability would not be an
Honestly, it escapes me how anyone in the last couple of years could
do a survey of source packages and get the idea that debmake was in
wide-spread use, and thuse choose it instead of debhelper. I'm sorry
someone didn't do their homework, and feels put out, but that's no
fault of, or defect in, debhelper
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org