On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:06:26AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > because it will prevent s.d.o from serving a buggy package. it's not > fixed perfectly, but at least it's not subject to a known exploit. Could you be a little more careful with your terms? A DOS is not an exploit, it's a DOS. By saying "exploit" your implying a far more critical problem than actually exists. -- Mike Stone
Attachment:
pgpYZNSzFH0LR.pgp
Description: PGP signature