[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: on potato's proftpd

Previously martin f krafft wrote:
> wrong. fix things with bandaid to give you more time to find the real
> problem. i am not saying that this is the final fix. put it this way,
> you aren't going to wait for intruders to make use of the opportunity
> while you search the drunkbold who broke your window last night. dig?

Lets put is this way: two people from the security team have stated they
want to know why the current security fix is broken before they will
consider introducing a bandaid.

So lets just stop this discussion and start looking why the glibc glob
fix fails for proftpd. EOD.


 /wichert@wiggy.net         This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org            http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: