Re: Packages file (long email) [WAS: Splitting Packages]
> That said, im sure its been considered (and asked) many times before,
> so anyone else know why Essential cant be implemented as a priority?
Yes, Essential and Priority are orthogonal things.
In theory, it's possible to have an essential package which is not required.
In practice, however, such package is likely to be a replacement of
another essential package, in which case it conflicts and replaces the
essential required package, and it's priority extra (since it conflicts
with a package of optional or higher priority). Not that there are many
packages like these in the archive, buy the possibility is open.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org