On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 07:39:18AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > The stated reasons that strl functions will not be included are: > > > - They promote bad or less readable code > > - They are "inefficient BSD crap" > > - They do not enhance security in any meaningful capacity > > You're missing "there's too much rubbish in glibc already and since we > can't take stuff out let's be careful about what we put in.". That's what they get for designing glibc to be a superset of everyone else's libc. But I did not see that reason stated in the linked threads at any rate. -- Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@bluecherry.net> Intelligent backside at large <aj> come on <aj> it's a pico clone <aj> it's *meant* to be annoying
Attachment:
pgpoGoGszG4er.pgp
Description: PGP signature