Re: ide-scsi as default
I agree. ide-scsi is less stable than ide-cd in my experience.
GNU GPL: "The Source will be with you... always."
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > Would anyone mind if we use the ide-scsi driver instead of ide-cd
> > as-default on the bf2.4 flavor? Additionaly, I suggest to put ide-scsi
> Well, 2.4 ide-scsi sometimes break (as in locks the drive hard) with common
> (shitty) hardware, such as some 52x "creative" CDROMS (e.g. Vendor: CREATIVE
> Model: CD5233E-CF Rev: 1.04).
> I suggest you guys stick to ide-cd for compatibility reasons.
> "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
> them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
> where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
> Henrique Holschuh