Re: Format for name of .changes file?

[elf@buici.com]

...then katie has a bug.  It rejected my package because the name of
my packages files was 'not valid'.  I don't have the reason file
anymore.  I suspect that katie explicitly checks this since there
was a reason file with that excuse. 

On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 08:02:19PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 elf@buici.com wrote:
> 
> > I have been using the format
> >
> >   <package>_<version>.changes
> >
> > The new archive maintenance program (katie?) doesn't like this.  It
> > does appear to like
> >
> >   <package>_<version>_<architecture>.changes
> >
> > I don't see a reference to this in the developer's reference or policy
> > manual.  What are our options?  Can the architecture be 'any'?  Can it
> > be 'source'?
> 
> The name of the .changes should not matter at all.
> 
> If it does, than katie has a bug.  I have no verified this, however.