Re: policy on start-stop-daemon
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> If something more powerful/flexible is needed (report status,
> detailed status, uptimes, cleanups, etc.) we should think about
> a proper structure for that instead of blindly adding more and
> more options to what should be a simple script to start or stop
> a service.
Be my guest... I would welcome any ideas on that area. LSB wants us to have
running status in there, btw.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
Reply to: