[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#132767: debsum support should be mandatory



Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes:

>  Bingo. Without the signature on the hash file, network access is
>  _required_ to do any verification. Assuming, of course, that the
>  Packages file has stayed around. And that is the telling blow to
>  your solution. Packages files are ephemeral.

Indeed they are -- today.  Sun keeps fingerprints of all the files
they have ever released.  You can give them a md5sum, and they'll tell
you which package or patch that file comes from.

Example use:  I submitted "706838f45324246b3cac7c7bbeecb18c" into
  http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/fileFingerprints.pl
and got the following result:

     706838f45324246b3cac7c7bbeecb18c - - 1 match(es) 
          canonical-path: /kernel/genunix 
          package: SUNWcsr 
          version: 11.7.0,REV=1998.09.01.04.16 
          architecture: sparc 
          source: Solaris 7/SPARC 
          patch: 106541-18 

See also http://www.sun.com/security/blueprints/#fingerprint

Debian could supply the same service, I don't think the data storage
requirements are a problem.

But I agree with Wichert -- this needs to be done properly in the
Debian infrastructure, it doesn't make sense to do this in each
package.


Kjetil T.



Reply to: