Re: Protecting user changes in developer scripts handled files

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Protecting user changes in developer scripts handled files
From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 21:33:11 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 87n0ypx6o8.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0202032022190.30052-100000@gradall.private.brainfood.com> (Adam Heath's message of "Sun, 3 Feb 2002 20:22:54 -0600 (CST)")
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0202032022190.30052-100000@gradall.private.brainfood.com>

>>"Adam" == Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org> writes:

 Adam> The PreDepends would still be needed.  Even if it is essential.
 Adam> A package would get upgraded from an older system that doesn't
 Adam> have the package that contains this script.

	Why, pray tell, is a pre depends needed?

	manoj
-- 
 Kissing a smoker is like licking an ashtray.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Protecting user changes in developer scripts handled files
  - From: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Protecting user changes in developer scripts handled files
Next by Date: Re: Subversion - the followup project to CVS - what about Arch?
Previous by thread: Re: Protecting user changes in developer scripts handled files
Next by thread: Re: Protecting user changes in developer scripts handled files
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread