[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sponsoring packages confusion?


On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 06:36:16PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:24:07AM +0100, Andreas Bombe wrote:
> > 
> > Then the section "The sponsor job" on
> > http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/ shows it not how it
> > should be done (doing it their way will let it appear as an NMU).
> <snipped from their site>
> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -m'Happy Sponsor <nice@foo.bar>'
> Yes, this is not right....

It used to be right. I used to do all uploads for packages I sponsor that
way, and didn't have any problems.
It had been a while though, and when I sponsored something about a month
(maybe one and a half) ago, built that way, it got tagged as an nmu.

Apparently dinstalls behaviour has changed.



* darkewolf does not get much work email - so i want to know when it comes in
<Overfiend> xbiff, glbiff, xmailbox...
<Overfiend> xmailbox plays sounds
* Overfiend hears monster snarls from Doom when he gets new mail

Attachment: pgpvpfPGKlPeR.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: