Re: Vim flavours
Wichert Akkerman <email@example.com> writes:
> Previously J?r?me Marant wrote:
> > There is currently one package per scripting language flavour,
> > i.e. vim-python, vim-perl and vim-tcl.
> > What is the reason for this split? Is it because you cannot have
> > all those flavours actived at a time ot is it a pure packaging
> > choice?
> Why not ask the vim maintainer instead of guessing that he is
> reading this list?
How could I know that it was related to upstream? I currently
can't have access to the package sources.
Being polite is so hard sometimes ...