[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Evolution and GnuPG

Oliver Elphick a écrit :
> I've noticed that Evolution (1.0-4) is very prone to report bad
> signatures.  To start with I thought it was down to use by the sender of
> a particular mailer, but I am beginning to doubt that.
> Do other mail clients give similar results?

I have noticed the same problem with evolution. It reports a number of 
GPG signatures as bad, when besides mutt reports them as good. The 
problem includes all mails written with gnus/oort, but also some others 
from various mailers (and I couldn't figure out which thing in the 
headers makes it get wrong).

 .''`.           Josselin Mouette        /\./\
: :' :           josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org
`. `'
  `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom

Attachment: pgpBi7fKVl9XO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: