Re: RFC: Keywords instead of Section

[lintux@lintux.cx]

And suddenly Thomas Hood had this magical idea:
>  It makes a _bit_ more sense to use 'other' as one of a range
>  of keywords of the same type.  E.g., 
>     license:gpl, license:bsd, license:prop, license:other
>  However, "license:other" still doesn't serve any particular
>  purpose.  I can always do without it by asking for packages that
>  are
>      !license:gpl && !license:bsd && !license:prop
>  or whatever I really want.  ':other' only has meaning relative to
>  the other keywords of that type; thus its meaning changes as
>  keywords of that type are added.
>  
How to mark non-free so that VRMS can find it? ;-)

-- 
*=-+-______________________
   |lintux-@t-lintux-d0t-cx:     _ Ugh! Nio2f says something: ______
   : http://www.lintux.cx/ |    / i the of to hat type committee ti \
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-+-=-+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+-=*