rproxy (Re: WOW! Re: Rsync on servers)
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 04:52:38PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> >>>>> "Adam" == Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org> writes:
>
> Adam> On 11 Nov 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> >> [snip]
>
> Adam> Where is this client? Offloading the cpu usage to the Adam>
> client is a huge win. Also, not requiring a special daemon Adam> on
> the server is another plus.
>
> Pity it has problems talking to non-rproxy servers though, including
> apache, see bug #83603.
>
> I use to use rproxy, but I found it wasn't usable because of this
> "bug"(???).
>
> Does HTTP define a maximum size for a request?
I do not think so. As the error message indicates, it is a server-imposed
limit.
Unless the Apache in question is rsync-capable, it's a waste of bandwidth to
send those headers anyway.
--
- mdz
Reply to: