On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 12:26:32AM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote: > > OK. Since I'm not going to build two packages I'd like to know what mutt > > users would prefer: > > - I move the package to non-US > > - I remove again and forever SSL support I vote for the first option. > IMO ssl support is crucial (on the internet) - everything should go > via secure protocols (is there any reason to have insecure protocols?) Protocols can be secure without necessarily being encrypted. Hop-by-hop encryption is a bit lame though, it would be far better (security and performance-wise) if everybody used end-to-end encryption, like PGP. -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <guus@sliepen.warande.net>
Attachment:
pgpiZKjJmfaMO.pgp
Description: PGP signature