On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 09:09:28PM +1000, Sam Couter wrote: > Christian Kurz <shorty@debian.org> wrote: > > Yes, the general idea behind this, seems like a good solution. I think > > the the details for the modules, the language to use and the decision > > which packages include which part of this, would need to be discussed a > > bit further. > > I was just throwing the idea in, I hadn't thought it all the way through > to a spec and design. I'd expect people with more knowledge and experience > than me to do that bit. > > What's more, I'm not really volunteering to do the work required > (although I don't think I'd be needed *or* particularly helpful), so I > can't very well say "This is the way it should be done!". This has been the problem all along :) This was discussed in the past, and people came up with good solutions, but no one ever implemented them.. Although this is probably the best solution so far. Thanks, Norbert
Attachment:
pgpIqiG3v5ef4.pgp
Description: PGP signature