Re: LSB specification of runlevels
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 10:19:04AM -0400, cfm@maine.com wrote:
> I'm confused about the need for a server admin to boot a machine to
> all sorts of run levels. Last time I booted a **server** to other than
> the default was init=/bin/sh because of the pam thing. And that was only
> a development server. Not that init=/bin/sh really qualifies as a
> runlevel. Before that the last time I wrestled with runlevels was
That was totally unnecessary. Booting to single user (which is a
runlevel) would have been sufficient.
--
Mike Stone
Reply to: