[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: real LSB compliance



On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 01:38:50AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> So, assuming we go the full LSB route, it might be a good idea to
> register a prefix like deb- for Debian.  If a package claims in its
> call to dh_installinit to have registered the init script name, then
> it uses the package supplied init script name.  Otherwise it uses
> deb-packagename.  I believe that the goal of having short init script

hell no!

that is GROSS.  lsb packages will be the minority, those are the ones
that should use hideous filenames.  lets not ruin our distribution for
this `standard' thanks very much.

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

Attachment: pgpz2Sj1Xd5Wm.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: