Re: Why is utah-glx not in testing ?
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 10:46:11PM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote:
> Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> > ajt@auric:~$ madison utah-glx
> > utah-glx | 0.0-cvs-20000921-5 | unstable | powerpc
> > utah-glx | 0.0-cvs-20001110-1 | unstable | m68k
> > utah-glx | 0.0-cvs-20001213-1 | unstable | mips
> > utah-glx | 0.0-cvs-20010214-1 | unstable | source, alpha, i386
> > The old utah-glx package, which is no longer built, but hasn't been
> > removed from the archive. Presumably the ppc, m68k and mips packages listed
> > above should all be removed?
> Could that be the cause of the testing problem ?
> If yes, I will file a bug to ftp.d.o for their removal...
It definitely is, although I'll cover all my bases and say there could
be others too. File the bug. :)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Reply to: