Re: real LSB compliance
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 12:15:48PM -0400, Alan Shutko wrote:
> Andreas Bombe <andreas@bombe.modem.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> writes:
>
> > It comes with its own libc and ld-linux.so. It does attempt to use its
> > own libc, however /lib/ld-linux.so is hardcoded and I haven't found a
> > way to make it use the version it comes with (short of setting up a
> > chroot).
>
> Maybe hex-edit the binary so it looks for /lib/ld-maple.so?
Bah, then I'd have to clutter up my /lib for some closed source program
I currently rarely want to use. Anyway, I just wanted to make the point
that one ld-linux.so does not work for everything that commercial
vendors might throw at us, therefore apparently the ld-lsb.so.
--
Andreas E. Bombe <andreas.bombe@munich.netsurf.de> DSA key 0x04880A44
Reply to: