Re: QPL in /usr/share/comon-licences (was: Re: wnpp: ITP: apc --
Previously John Galt wrote:
> Wasn't that the bone of contention? Whether or not the present tack of
> symlinking /usr/share/doc/common-license was allowable? I was
> hypothesizing that this was not the case.
Yes, but Ben came up with the trick if putting the full GPL in the
package, and replacing that file with a symlink in the postinst.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| wichert@wiggy.net http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: