Re: Intent to NMU mozilla and ITP mozilla-cvs
Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> writes:
> >>>>> "David" == David B Harris <dbarclay10@yahoo.ca> writes:
>
> David> To quote Takuo KITAME <kitame@northeye.org>,
> >> I've just done build new mozilla package. It's separated into
> >> multi binary package. But still not split libnspr4 from
> >> mozilla source. (Is it needed?)
>
> David> I believe it would be good to have Mozilla and other
> David> Mozilla-dependent applications in main/, if at all
> David> possible.
>
> This certainly was not the consensus of debian-legal when discussion
> of Postgres happened. I believe that consensus was well motivated and
> should generally hold.
>
> We want a secure operating system; that means we want to support
> crypto interfaces. If this pushes stuff into non-us, then non-us
> grows.
This fine for me too, but I suggest to add subsections to non-us
like the ones in main.
Bye
Racke
--
Master of Swiss Web 2001: http://www.zweifel.ch/
For projects and other business stuff please refer to COBOLT NetServices
(URL: http://www.cobolt.net; Email: info@cobolt.net; Phone: 0041-1-3884400)
Reply to: